Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple Nut Instant Oatmeal vs Premium Long Grain Rice Enriched

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Maple Nut Instant Oatmeal

Maple Nut Instant Oatmeal

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Premium Long Grain Rice Enriched

Premium Long Grain Rice Enriched

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
420 kcal
Energy
355.6 kcal
22g
Sugars
0g
8g
Fat
0g
10g
Protein
6.7g
0.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple Nut Instant Oatmeal and Premium Long Grain Rice Enriched side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Maple Nut Instant Oatmeal is the more energy-dense option here, packing 64 more calories per 100g than Premium Long Grain Rice Enriched. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Maple Nut Instant Oatmeal contains significantly more sugar (22g) compared to the milder Premium Long Grain Rice Enriched (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Premium Long Grain Rice Enriched is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Maple Nut Instant Oatmeal offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Premium Long Grain Rice Enriched in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple Nut Instant Oatmeal or Premium Long Grain Rice Enriched?

It depends on your goals. Maple Nut Instant Oatmeal has 420 calories, while Premium Long Grain Rice Enriched has 355.55555555556 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple Nut Instant Oatmeal vegan?

No, Maple Nut Instant Oatmeal is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple Nut Instant Oatmeal and Premium Long Grain Rice Enriched?

There is a difference of 64 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.