Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple Oat Granola vs Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Maple Oat Granola

Maple Oat Granola

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium

Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
429 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
21.4g
Sugars
0g
17.9g
Fat
30g
7.1g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple Oat Granola and Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Maple Oat Granola is the more energy-dense option here, packing 129 more calories per 100g than Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Maple Oat Granola contains significantly more sugar (21.4g) compared to the milder Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Maple Oat Granola offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple Oat Granola or Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium?

It depends on your goals. Maple Oat Granola has 429 calories, while Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple Oat Granola vegan?

No, Maple Oat Granola is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple Oat Granola and Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium?

There is a difference of 129 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.