Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple Sea Salt vs Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Maple Sea Salt

Maple Sea Salt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel

Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
364 kcal
Energy
417 kcal
5.5g
Sugars
0g
18.2g
Fat
12.5g
32.7g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple Sea Salt and Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Maple Sea Salt is the clear winner. With 53 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Maple Sea Salt contains significantly more sugar (5.45g) compared to the milder Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Maple Sea Salt offers a protein boost with 32.7g per 100g, outperforming Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple Sea Salt or Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel?

It depends on your goals. Maple Sea Salt has 364 calories, while Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel has 417 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple Sea Salt vegan?

No, Maple Sea Salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple Sea Salt and Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel?

There is a difference of 53 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.