Maple Walnut Kringle vs Sweet mesquite bbq flavored kettle cooked potato chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Maple Walnut Kringle
Sweet mesquite bbq flavored kettle cooked potato chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Maple Walnut Kringle and Sweet mesquite bbq flavored kettle cooked potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Maple Walnut Kringle is the clear winner. With 89 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Maple Walnut Kringle contains significantly more sugar (28.6g) compared to the milder Sweet mesquite bbq flavored kettle cooked potato chips (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet mesquite bbq flavored kettle cooked potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Maple Walnut Kringle or Sweet mesquite bbq flavored kettle cooked potato chips?
It depends on your goals. Maple Walnut Kringle has 411 calories, while Sweet mesquite bbq flavored kettle cooked potato chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Maple Walnut Kringle vegan?
No, Maple Walnut Kringle is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Maple Walnut Kringle and Sweet mesquite bbq flavored kettle cooked potato chips?
There is a difference of 89 calories per 100g between the two products.
