Head-to-Head Analysis

Marbe Jack vs Winter’s Basket Fudge Dipped Pepperment Soft Batch Cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Marbe Jack

Marbe Jack

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Winter’s Basket Fudge Dipped Pepperment Soft Batch Cookies

Winter’s Basket Fudge Dipped Pepperment Soft Batch Cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
381 kcal
0g
Sugars
38.1g
30g
Fat
14.3g
25g
Protein
4.8g
1.5g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Marbe Jack and Winter’s Basket Fudge Dipped Pepperment Soft Batch Cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Marbe Jack is the more energy-dense option here, packing 19 more calories per 100g than Winter’s Basket Fudge Dipped Pepperment Soft Batch Cookies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Marbe Jack takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Winter’s Basket Fudge Dipped Pepperment Soft Batch Cookies contains 38.1g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Marbe Jack offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Winter’s Basket Fudge Dipped Pepperment Soft Batch Cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Marbe Jack or Winter’s Basket Fudge Dipped Pepperment Soft Batch Cookies?

It depends on your goals. Marbe Jack has 400 calories, while Winter’s Basket Fudge Dipped Pepperment Soft Batch Cookies has 381 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Marbe Jack vegan?

No, Marbe Jack is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Marbe Jack and Winter’s Basket Fudge Dipped Pepperment Soft Batch Cookies?

There is a difference of 19 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.