Head-to-Head Analysis

Market organic crunchy peanut butter vs Tajín Chile Clásico

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Market organic crunchy peanut butter

Market organic crunchy peanut butter

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tajín Chile Clásico

Tajín Chile Clásico

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
633 kcal
Energy
200 kcal
6.7g
Sugars
0g
46.7g
Fat
0g
26.7g
Protein
0g
0.4g
Salt
46.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Market organic crunchy peanut butter and Tajín Chile Clásico side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Market organic crunchy peanut butter is the more energy-dense option here, packing 433 more calories per 100g than Tajín Chile Clásico. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Market organic crunchy peanut butter contains significantly more sugar (6.67g) compared to the milder Tajín Chile Clásico (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tajín Chile Clásico is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Market organic crunchy peanut butter offers a protein boost with 26.7g per 100g, outperforming Tajín Chile Clásico in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Market organic crunchy peanut butter or Tajín Chile Clásico?

It depends on your goals. Market organic crunchy peanut butter has 633 calories, while Tajín Chile Clásico has 200 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Market organic crunchy peanut butter vegan?

No, Market organic crunchy peanut butter is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Market organic crunchy peanut butter and Tajín Chile Clásico?

There is a difference of 433 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.