Head-to-Head Analysis

Matcha Latte Mix vs Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Matcha Latte Mix

Matcha Latte Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip

Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
350 kcal
Energy
425 kcal
80g
Sugars
22.5g
0g
Fat
15g
0g
Protein
15g
0g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Matcha Latte Mix and Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Matcha Latte Mix is the clear winner. With 75 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Matcha Latte Mix contains significantly more sugar (80g) compared to the milder Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip (22.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Matcha Latte Mix or Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip?

It depends on your goals. Matcha Latte Mix has 350 calories, while Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip has 425 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Matcha Latte Mix vegan?

No, Matcha Latte Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Matcha Latte Mix and Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip?

There is a difference of 75 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.