Head-to-Head Analysis

Matcha Red Bean Milk Flavor Dorayaki Pancake vs Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Matcha Red Bean Milk Flavor Dorayaki Pancake

Matcha Red Bean Milk Flavor Dorayaki Pancake

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows

Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
418 kcal
Energy
385 kcal
21.8g
Sugars
61.5g
25.5g
Fat
9.6g
5.5g
Protein
3.9g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Matcha Red Bean Milk Flavor Dorayaki Pancake and Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Matcha Red Bean Milk Flavor Dorayaki Pancake is the more energy-dense option here, packing 33 more calories per 100g than Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Matcha Red Bean Milk Flavor Dorayaki Pancake takes the lead with only 21.8g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows contains 61.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Matcha Red Bean Milk Flavor Dorayaki Pancake or Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows?

It depends on your goals. Matcha Red Bean Milk Flavor Dorayaki Pancake has 418 calories, while Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows has 385 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Matcha Red Bean Milk Flavor Dorayaki Pancake vegan?

No, Matcha Red Bean Milk Flavor Dorayaki Pancake is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Matcha Red Bean Milk Flavor Dorayaki Pancake and Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.