Head-to-Head Analysis

Matcha White Chocolate Truffles vs Dark chocolate sea salt granola bites

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Matcha White Chocolate Truffles

Matcha White Chocolate Truffles

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Dark chocolate sea salt granola bites

Dark chocolate sea salt granola bites

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
640 kcal
Energy
414.6 kcal
44g
Sugars
19.5g
48g
Fat
17.1g
4g
Protein
9.8g
0.2g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Matcha White Chocolate Truffles and Dark chocolate sea salt granola bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Matcha White Chocolate Truffles is the more energy-dense option here, packing 225 more calories per 100g than Dark chocolate sea salt granola bites. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Matcha White Chocolate Truffles contains significantly more sugar (44g) compared to the milder Dark chocolate sea salt granola bites (19.512195121951g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Dark chocolate sea salt granola bites is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Matcha White Chocolate Truffles or Dark chocolate sea salt granola bites?

It depends on your goals. Matcha White Chocolate Truffles has 640 calories, while Dark chocolate sea salt granola bites has 414.63414634146 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Matcha White Chocolate Truffles vegan?

No, Matcha White Chocolate Truffles is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Matcha White Chocolate Truffles and Dark chocolate sea salt granola bites?

There is a difference of 225 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.