Head-to-Head Analysis

Maui Wowie vs Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Maui Wowie

Maui Wowie

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT

Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
263.2 kcal
32.1g
Sugars
0g
3.6g
Fat
0g
28.6g
Protein
0g
3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maui Wowie and Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Maui Wowie is the more energy-dense option here, packing 23 more calories per 100g than Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Maui Wowie contains significantly more sugar (32.1g) compared to the milder Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Maui Wowie offers a protein boost with 28.6g per 100g, outperforming Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maui Wowie or Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT?

It depends on your goals. Maui Wowie has 286 calories, while Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT has 263.15789803904 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maui Wowie vegan?

No, Maui Wowie is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maui Wowie and Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT?

There is a difference of 23 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.