Head-to-Head Analysis

MAX 30g PROTEIN NUTRITIONAL SHAKE Rich Chocolate vs Light Orange

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of MAX 30g PROTEIN NUTRITIONAL SHAKE Rich Chocolate

MAX 30g PROTEIN NUTRITIONAL SHAKE Rich Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Light Orange

Light Orange

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
49.2 kcal
Energy
20.8 kcal
0.3g
Sugars
3.8g
0.6g
Fat
0g
9.2g
Protein
0.4g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing MAX 30g PROTEIN NUTRITIONAL SHAKE Rich Chocolate and Light Orange side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

MAX 30g PROTEIN NUTRITIONAL SHAKE Rich Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 28 more calories per 100g than Light Orange. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, MAX 30g PROTEIN NUTRITIONAL SHAKE Rich Chocolate takes the lead with only 0.308g of sugar per 100g, whereas Light Orange contains 3.75g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? MAX 30g PROTEIN NUTRITIONAL SHAKE Rich Chocolate offers a protein boost with 9.23g per 100g, outperforming Light Orange in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: MAX 30g PROTEIN NUTRITIONAL SHAKE Rich Chocolate or Light Orange?

It depends on your goals. MAX 30g PROTEIN NUTRITIONAL SHAKE Rich Chocolate has 49.2 calories, while Light Orange has 20.8 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is MAX 30g PROTEIN NUTRITIONAL SHAKE Rich Chocolate vegan?

No, MAX 30g PROTEIN NUTRITIONAL SHAKE Rich Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between MAX 30g PROTEIN NUTRITIONAL SHAKE Rich Chocolate and Light Orange?

There is a difference of 28 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.