Head-to-Head Analysis

Meal Replacement Shake Chocolate vs Yakitori Chicken w/Japanese-style Fried Rice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Meal Replacement Shake Chocolate

Meal Replacement Shake Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Yakitori Chicken w/Japanese-style Fried Rice

Yakitori Chicken w/Japanese-style Fried Rice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
55.4 kcal
Energy
173 kcal
5.5g
Sugars
3.1g
1.5g
Fat
3.1g
3.1g
Protein
7.5g
0.2g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Meal Replacement Shake Chocolate and Yakitori Chicken w/Japanese-style Fried Rice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Meal Replacement Shake Chocolate is the clear winner. With 118 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Meal Replacement Shake Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (5.54g) compared to the milder Yakitori Chicken w/Japanese-style Fried Rice (3.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Yakitori Chicken w/Japanese-style Fried Rice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Meal Replacement Shake Chocolate or Yakitori Chicken w/Japanese-style Fried Rice?

It depends on your goals. Meal Replacement Shake Chocolate has 55.4 calories, while Yakitori Chicken w/Japanese-style Fried Rice has 173 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Meal Replacement Shake Chocolate vegan?

No, Meal Replacement Shake Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Meal Replacement Shake Chocolate and Yakitori Chicken w/Japanese-style Fried Rice?

There is a difference of 118 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.