Head-to-Head Analysis

Medium roast subtly sweet iced coffee vs Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Medium roast subtly sweet iced coffee

Medium roast subtly sweet iced coffee

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew

Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
16.7 kcal
Energy
54.2 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
0.8g
0g
Fat
3.3g
0.3g
Protein
4.2g
0g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Medium roast subtly sweet iced coffee and Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Medium roast subtly sweet iced coffee is the clear winner. With 37 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Medium roast subtly sweet iced coffee contains significantly more sugar (3.3333333333333g) compared to the milder Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew (0.83333333333333g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Medium roast subtly sweet iced coffee or Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew?

It depends on your goals. Medium roast subtly sweet iced coffee has 16.666666666667 calories, while Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew has 54.166666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Medium roast subtly sweet iced coffee vegan?

No, Medium roast subtly sweet iced coffee is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Medium roast subtly sweet iced coffee and Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew?

There is a difference of 37 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.