Head-to-Head Analysis

Medium salsa vs Sweet & Spicy Polynesian Hawaiian Barbecue Sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Medium salsa

Medium salsa

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet & Spicy Polynesian Hawaiian Barbecue Sauce

Sweet & Spicy Polynesian Hawaiian Barbecue Sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
48.4 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
3.2g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
3.2g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Medium salsa and Sweet & Spicy Polynesian Hawaiian Barbecue Sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Medium salsa is the more energy-dense option here, packing 48 more calories per 100g than Sweet & Spicy Polynesian Hawaiian Barbecue Sauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Medium salsa contains significantly more sugar (3.23g) compared to the milder Sweet & Spicy Polynesian Hawaiian Barbecue Sauce (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet & Spicy Polynesian Hawaiian Barbecue Sauce is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Medium salsa offers a protein boost with 3.23g per 100g, outperforming Sweet & Spicy Polynesian Hawaiian Barbecue Sauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Medium salsa or Sweet & Spicy Polynesian Hawaiian Barbecue Sauce?

It depends on your goals. Medium salsa has 48.4 calories, while Sweet & Spicy Polynesian Hawaiian Barbecue Sauce has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Medium salsa vegan?

No, Medium salsa is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Medium salsa and Sweet & Spicy Polynesian Hawaiian Barbecue Sauce?

There is a difference of 48 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.