Head-to-Head Analysis

Member's Mark Marinated Alaskan Salmon vs Sardines In Tomato Sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Member's Mark Marinated Alaskan Salmon

Member's Mark Marinated Alaskan Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sardines In Tomato Sauce

Sardines In Tomato Sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
141 kcal
Energy
82.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
1.2g
7.7g
Fat
2.9g
17.6g
Protein
8.2g
0.8g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Member's Mark Marinated Alaskan Salmon and Sardines In Tomato Sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Member's Mark Marinated Alaskan Salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 59 more calories per 100g than Sardines In Tomato Sauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Member's Mark Marinated Alaskan Salmon takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sardines In Tomato Sauce contains 1.18g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Member's Mark Marinated Alaskan Salmon offers a protein boost with 17.6g per 100g, outperforming Sardines In Tomato Sauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Member's Mark Marinated Alaskan Salmon or Sardines In Tomato Sauce?

It depends on your goals. Member's Mark Marinated Alaskan Salmon has 141 calories, while Sardines In Tomato Sauce has 82.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Member's Mark Marinated Alaskan Salmon vegan?

No, Member's Mark Marinated Alaskan Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Member's Mark Marinated Alaskan Salmon and Sardines In Tomato Sauce?

There is a difference of 59 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.