Members Mark Boneless Skinless Chicken Breast vs reduced fat triscuit crackers
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Members Mark Boneless Skinless Chicken Breast
reduced fat triscuit crackers
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Members Mark Boneless Skinless Chicken Breast and reduced fat triscuit crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Members Mark Boneless Skinless Chicken Breast is the clear winner. With 277 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
Looking to build muscle? Members Mark Boneless Skinless Chicken Breast offers a protein boost with 22.3g per 100g, outperforming reduced fat triscuit crackers in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Members Mark Boneless Skinless Chicken Breast or reduced fat triscuit crackers?
It depends on your goals. Members Mark Boneless Skinless Chicken Breast has 116 calories, while reduced fat triscuit crackers has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Members Mark Boneless Skinless Chicken Breast vegan?
No, Members Mark Boneless Skinless Chicken Breast is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Members Mark Boneless Skinless Chicken Breast and reduced fat triscuit crackers?
There is a difference of 277 calories per 100g between the two products.
