Head-to-Head Analysis

Members Mark organic chicken wings vs Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Members Mark organic chicken wings

Members Mark organic chicken wings

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws

Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
97 kcal
Energy
462 kcal
0g
Sugars
46.2g
3.1g
Fat
15.4g
17.6g
Protein
7.7g
0.2g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Members Mark organic chicken wings and Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Members Mark organic chicken wings is the clear winner. With 365 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Members Mark organic chicken wings takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws contains 46.2g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Members Mark organic chicken wings offers a protein boost with 17.6g per 100g, outperforming Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Members Mark organic chicken wings or Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws?

Members Mark organic chicken wings appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Members Mark organic chicken wings vegan?

No, Members Mark organic chicken wings is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Members Mark organic chicken wings and Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws?

There is a difference of 365 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.