Head-to-Head Analysis

Metabolic Super Fruit & Vegetable Drink Mix vs Chips Ahoy! Thins original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Metabolic Super Fruit & Vegetable Drink Mix

Metabolic Super Fruit & Vegetable Drink Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chips Ahoy! Thins original

Chips Ahoy! Thins original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
421.1 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
21.1g
Sugars
40g
5.3g
Fat
23.3g
10.5g
Protein
3.3g
0.3g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Metabolic Super Fruit & Vegetable Drink Mix and Chips Ahoy! Thins original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Metabolic Super Fruit & Vegetable Drink Mix is the clear winner. With 79 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Metabolic Super Fruit & Vegetable Drink Mix takes the lead with only 21.052631578947g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chips Ahoy! Thins original contains 40g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Metabolic Super Fruit & Vegetable Drink Mix offers a protein boost with 10.526315789474g per 100g, outperforming Chips Ahoy! Thins original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Metabolic Super Fruit & Vegetable Drink Mix or Chips Ahoy! Thins original?

Metabolic Super Fruit & Vegetable Drink Mix appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Metabolic Super Fruit & Vegetable Drink Mix vegan?

No, Metabolic Super Fruit & Vegetable Drink Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Metabolic Super Fruit & Vegetable Drink Mix and Chips Ahoy! Thins original?

There is a difference of 79 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.