Head-to-Head Analysis

Mexican Style 4 Cheese Blend vs California Pitted Prunes Dried Plums

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Mexican Style 4 Cheese Blend

Mexican Style 4 Cheese Blend

Not Vegan
VS
Package of California Pitted Prunes Dried Plums

California Pitted Prunes Dried Plums

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
393 kcal
Energy
250 kcal
0g
Sugars
37.5g
28.6g
Fat
0g
28.6g
Protein
2.5g
1.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mexican Style 4 Cheese Blend and California Pitted Prunes Dried Plums side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Mexican Style 4 Cheese Blend is the more energy-dense option here, packing 143 more calories per 100g than California Pitted Prunes Dried Plums. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Mexican Style 4 Cheese Blend takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas California Pitted Prunes Dried Plums contains 37.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Mexican Style 4 Cheese Blend offers a protein boost with 28.6g per 100g, outperforming California Pitted Prunes Dried Plums in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mexican Style 4 Cheese Blend or California Pitted Prunes Dried Plums?

It depends on your goals. Mexican Style 4 Cheese Blend has 393 calories, while California Pitted Prunes Dried Plums has 250 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mexican Style 4 Cheese Blend vegan?

No, Mexican Style 4 Cheese Blend is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mexican Style 4 Cheese Blend and California Pitted Prunes Dried Plums?

There is a difference of 143 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.