Head-to-Head Analysis

Microwavable hamburgers vs Chicken Tenders

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Microwavable hamburgers

Microwavable hamburgers

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken Tenders

Chicken Tenders

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
300 kcal
Energy
202 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
0g
14.4g
Fat
8.3g
13.3g
Protein
15.5g
1g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Microwavable hamburgers and Chicken Tenders side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Microwavable hamburgers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 98 more calories per 100g than Chicken Tenders. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Microwavable hamburgers contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Chicken Tenders (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken Tenders is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Microwavable hamburgers or Chicken Tenders?

It depends on your goals. Microwavable hamburgers has 300 calories, while Chicken Tenders has 202 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Microwavable hamburgers vegan?

No, Microwavable hamburgers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Microwavable hamburgers and Chicken Tenders?

There is a difference of 98 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.