Head-to-Head Analysis

Microwavable hamburgers vs chipotle shrimp with rice & beans

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Microwavable hamburgers

Microwavable hamburgers

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of chipotle shrimp with rice & beans

chipotle shrimp with rice & beans

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
300 kcal
Energy
107 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
1.1g
14.4g
Fat
1.8g
13.3g
Protein
4.4g
1g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Microwavable hamburgers and chipotle shrimp with rice & beans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Microwavable hamburgers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 193 more calories per 100g than chipotle shrimp with rice & beans. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Microwavable hamburgers contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder chipotle shrimp with rice & beans (1.1g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, chipotle shrimp with rice & beans is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Microwavable hamburgers offers a protein boost with 13.33g per 100g, outperforming chipotle shrimp with rice & beans in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Microwavable hamburgers or chipotle shrimp with rice & beans?

It depends on your goals. Microwavable hamburgers has 300 calories, while chipotle shrimp with rice & beans has 107 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Microwavable hamburgers vegan?

No, Microwavable hamburgers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Microwavable hamburgers and chipotle shrimp with rice & beans?

There is a difference of 193 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.