Head-to-Head Analysis

Microwaveable Beef Stew vs Slow Cooked Uncured Ham

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Microwaveable Beef Stew

Microwaveable Beef Stew

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Slow Cooked Uncured Ham

Slow Cooked Uncured Ham

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
36.5 kcal
Energy
198 kcal
0.7g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
6.6g
1.8g
Protein
36.4g
0g
Salt
3.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Microwaveable Beef Stew and Slow Cooked Uncured Ham side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Microwaveable Beef Stew is the clear winner. With 161 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Microwaveable Beef Stew or Slow Cooked Uncured Ham?

It depends on your goals. Microwaveable Beef Stew has 36.5 calories, while Slow Cooked Uncured Ham has 198 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Microwaveable Beef Stew vegan?

No, Microwaveable Beef Stew is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Microwaveable Beef Stew and Slow Cooked Uncured Ham?

There is a difference of 161 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.