Head-to-Head Analysis

Milano Dark Chocolate Cookies vs Fudge striped shortbread

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milano Dark Chocolate Cookies

Milano Dark Chocolate Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Fudge striped shortbread

Fudge striped shortbread

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
486.7 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
31g
Sugars
0g
26.5g
Fat
0g
4.4g
Protein
0g
0.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milano Dark Chocolate Cookies and Fudge striped shortbread side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Milano Dark Chocolate Cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 487 more calories per 100g than Fudge striped shortbread. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milano Dark Chocolate Cookies contains significantly more sugar (30.973451327434g) compared to the milder Fudge striped shortbread (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Fudge striped shortbread is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Milano Dark Chocolate Cookies offers a protein boost with 4.4247787610619g per 100g, outperforming Fudge striped shortbread in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milano Dark Chocolate Cookies or Fudge striped shortbread?

It depends on your goals. Milano Dark Chocolate Cookies has 486.72566371681 calories, while Fudge striped shortbread has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milano Dark Chocolate Cookies vegan?

No, Milano Dark Chocolate Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milano Dark Chocolate Cookies and Fudge striped shortbread?

There is a difference of 487 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.