Head-to-Head Analysis

Mild Diced Tomatoes Green Chiles vs Grain Free Tortilla Chips Sprinkle of Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mild Diced Tomatoes Green Chiles

Mild Diced Tomatoes Green Chiles

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Grain Free Tortilla Chips Sprinkle of Sea Salt

Grain Free Tortilla Chips Sprinkle of Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
21.4 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
2.6g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
25g
0.9g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mild Diced Tomatoes Green Chiles and Grain Free Tortilla Chips Sprinkle of Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mild Diced Tomatoes Green Chiles is the clear winner. With 443 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mild Diced Tomatoes Green Chiles contains significantly more sugar (2.56g) compared to the milder Grain Free Tortilla Chips Sprinkle of Sea Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Grain Free Tortilla Chips Sprinkle of Sea Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mild Diced Tomatoes Green Chiles or Grain Free Tortilla Chips Sprinkle of Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. Mild Diced Tomatoes Green Chiles has 21.4 calories, while Grain Free Tortilla Chips Sprinkle of Sea Salt has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mild Diced Tomatoes Green Chiles vegan?

No, Mild Diced Tomatoes Green Chiles is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mild Diced Tomatoes Green Chiles and Grain Free Tortilla Chips Sprinkle of Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 443 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.