Milk vs Coca-Cola Spiced Zero Sugar
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Milk
Coca-Cola Spiced Zero Sugar
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Milk and Coca-Cola Spiced Zero Sugar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Milk is the more energy-dense option here, packing 54 more calories per 100g than Coca-Cola Spiced Zero Sugar. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk contains significantly more sugar (5g) compared to the milder Coca-Cola Spiced Zero Sugar (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Coca-Cola Spiced Zero Sugar is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Milk offers a protein boost with 3.33g per 100g, outperforming Coca-Cola Spiced Zero Sugar in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Milk or Coca-Cola Spiced Zero Sugar?
It depends on your goals. Milk has 54.2 calories, while Coca-Cola Spiced Zero Sugar has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Milk vegan?
No, Milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Milk and Coca-Cola Spiced Zero Sugar?
There is a difference of 54 calories per 100g between the two products.
