Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk caramel filled squares vs Lindt Excellence A Touch of Sea Salt Dark Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk caramel filled squares

Milk caramel filled squares

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lindt Excellence A Touch of Sea Salt Dark Chocolate

Lindt Excellence A Touch of Sea Salt Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
533 kcal
53.3g
Sugars
46.7g
26.7g
Fat
33.3g
6.7g
Protein
6.7g
0.4g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk caramel filled squares and Lindt Excellence A Touch of Sea Salt Dark Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Milk caramel filled squares is the clear winner. With 33 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk caramel filled squares contains significantly more sugar (53.333333333333g) compared to the milder Lindt Excellence A Touch of Sea Salt Dark Chocolate (46.7g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lindt Excellence A Touch of Sea Salt Dark Chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk caramel filled squares or Lindt Excellence A Touch of Sea Salt Dark Chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Milk caramel filled squares has 500 calories, while Lindt Excellence A Touch of Sea Salt Dark Chocolate has 533 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk caramel filled squares vegan?

No, Milk caramel filled squares is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk caramel filled squares and Lindt Excellence A Touch of Sea Salt Dark Chocolate?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.