Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk Chocolate vs Organic great value blue corn tortilla chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk Chocolate

Milk Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic great value blue corn tortilla chips

Organic great value blue corn tortilla chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
527 kcal
Energy
97 kcal
59g
Sugars
0g
29g
Fat
6g
5.8g
Protein
2g
0.2g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk Chocolate and Organic great value blue corn tortilla chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Milk Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 430 more calories per 100g than Organic great value blue corn tortilla chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (59g) compared to the milder Organic great value blue corn tortilla chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic great value blue corn tortilla chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Milk Chocolate offers a protein boost with 5.8g per 100g, outperforming Organic great value blue corn tortilla chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate or Organic great value blue corn tortilla chips?

It depends on your goals. Milk Chocolate has 527 calories, while Organic great value blue corn tortilla chips has 97 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk Chocolate vegan?

No, Milk Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk Chocolate and Organic great value blue corn tortilla chips?

There is a difference of 430 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.