Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk chocolate candy vs Granatapfel Sauerkirsche Fruchtgummi

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk chocolate candy

Milk chocolate candy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Granatapfel Sauerkirsche Fruchtgummi

Granatapfel Sauerkirsche Fruchtgummi

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
138 kcal
56.2g
Sugars
0.4g
28.1g
Fat
1.8g
6.3g
Protein
2.9g
0.2g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk chocolate candy and Granatapfel Sauerkirsche Fruchtgummi side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Milk chocolate candy is the more energy-dense option here, packing 362 more calories per 100g than Granatapfel Sauerkirsche Fruchtgummi. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk chocolate candy contains significantly more sugar (56.2g) compared to the milder Granatapfel Sauerkirsche Fruchtgummi (0.4g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Granatapfel Sauerkirsche Fruchtgummi is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Milk chocolate candy offers a protein boost with 6.25g per 100g, outperforming Granatapfel Sauerkirsche Fruchtgummi in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk chocolate candy or Granatapfel Sauerkirsche Fruchtgummi?

It depends on your goals. Milk chocolate candy has 500 calories, while Granatapfel Sauerkirsche Fruchtgummi has 138 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk chocolate candy vegan?

No, Milk chocolate candy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk chocolate candy and Granatapfel Sauerkirsche Fruchtgummi?

There is a difference of 362 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.