Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts vs Kettle Cooked Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts

Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kettle Cooked Original

Kettle Cooked Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
517.2 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
41.4g
Sugars
3.6g
37.9g
Fat
32.1g
13.8g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts and Kettle Cooked Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts is the clear winner. With 18 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts contains significantly more sugar (41.379310344828g) compared to the milder Kettle Cooked Original (3.57142857142857g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kettle Cooked Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts offers a protein boost with 13.793103448276g per 100g, outperforming Kettle Cooked Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts or Kettle Cooked Original?

It depends on your goals. Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts has 517.24137931034 calories, while Kettle Cooked Original has 535.714285714286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts vegan?

No, Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts and Kettle Cooked Original?

There is a difference of 18 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.