Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts vs Dark Chocolate Confection

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts

Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Dark Chocolate Confection

Dark Chocolate Confection

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1910 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
115g
Sugars
42.9g
51g
Fat
35.7g
51g
Protein
7.1g
0.3g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts and Dark Chocolate Confection side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts is the more energy-dense option here, packing 1339 more calories per 100g than Dark Chocolate Confection. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts contains significantly more sugar (115g) compared to the milder Dark Chocolate Confection (42.86g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Dark Chocolate Confection is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts offers a protein boost with 51g per 100g, outperforming Dark Chocolate Confection in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts or Dark Chocolate Confection?

It depends on your goals. Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts has 1910 calories, while Dark Chocolate Confection has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts vegan?

No, Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk Chocolate Covered Peanuts and Dark Chocolate Confection?

There is a difference of 1339 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.