Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk Chocolate Covered Strawberries vs Walnut Halves & Pieces

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk Chocolate Covered Strawberries

Milk Chocolate Covered Strawberries

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Walnut Halves & Pieces

Walnut Halves & Pieces

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
267 kcal
Energy
679 kcal
26.7g
Sugars
3.6g
16.7g
Fat
64.3g
3.3g
Protein
14.3g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk Chocolate Covered Strawberries and Walnut Halves & Pieces side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Milk Chocolate Covered Strawberries is the clear winner. With 412 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk Chocolate Covered Strawberries contains significantly more sugar (26.7g) compared to the milder Walnut Halves & Pieces (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Walnut Halves & Pieces is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Covered Strawberries or Walnut Halves & Pieces?

It depends on your goals. Milk Chocolate Covered Strawberries has 267 calories, while Walnut Halves & Pieces has 679 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk Chocolate Covered Strawberries vegan?

No, Milk Chocolate Covered Strawberries is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk Chocolate Covered Strawberries and Walnut Halves & Pieces?

There is a difference of 412 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.