Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk chocolate eggs with soft fondant center vs ORIGINAL MICROWAVE POPCORN

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk chocolate eggs with soft fondant center

Milk chocolate eggs with soft fondant center

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of ORIGINAL MICROWAVE POPCORN

ORIGINAL MICROWAVE POPCORN

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
441 kcal
Energy
367 kcal
64.7g
Sugars
0g
14.7g
Fat
8.3g
2.9g
Protein
10g
0.1g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk chocolate eggs with soft fondant center and ORIGINAL MICROWAVE POPCORN side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Milk chocolate eggs with soft fondant center is the more energy-dense option here, packing 74 more calories per 100g than ORIGINAL MICROWAVE POPCORN. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk chocolate eggs with soft fondant center contains significantly more sugar (64.7g) compared to the milder ORIGINAL MICROWAVE POPCORN (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, ORIGINAL MICROWAVE POPCORN is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk chocolate eggs with soft fondant center or ORIGINAL MICROWAVE POPCORN?

It depends on your goals. Milk chocolate eggs with soft fondant center has 441 calories, while ORIGINAL MICROWAVE POPCORN has 367 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk chocolate eggs with soft fondant center vegan?

No, Milk chocolate eggs with soft fondant center is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk chocolate eggs with soft fondant center and ORIGINAL MICROWAVE POPCORN?

There is a difference of 74 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.