Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk Chocolate Macadamia Nuts vs Gerber Puffs Blueberry imp

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk Chocolate Macadamia Nuts

Milk Chocolate Macadamia Nuts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Gerber Puffs Blueberry imp

Gerber Puffs Blueberry imp

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
357 kcal
46.4g
Sugars
14.3g
39.3g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk Chocolate Macadamia Nuts and Gerber Puffs Blueberry imp side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Milk Chocolate Macadamia Nuts is the more energy-dense option here, packing 214 more calories per 100g than Gerber Puffs Blueberry imp. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk Chocolate Macadamia Nuts contains significantly more sugar (46.4g) compared to the milder Gerber Puffs Blueberry imp (14.3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Gerber Puffs Blueberry imp is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Milk Chocolate Macadamia Nuts offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Gerber Puffs Blueberry imp in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Macadamia Nuts or Gerber Puffs Blueberry imp?

It depends on your goals. Milk Chocolate Macadamia Nuts has 571 calories, while Gerber Puffs Blueberry imp has 357 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk Chocolate Macadamia Nuts vegan?

No, Milk Chocolate Macadamia Nuts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk Chocolate Macadamia Nuts and Gerber Puffs Blueberry imp?

There is a difference of 214 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.