Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk Chocolate Marshmallows vs Lay's Lightly Salted Barbecue Flavored Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk Chocolate Marshmallows

Milk Chocolate Marshmallows

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lay's Lightly Salted Barbecue Flavored Potato Chips

Lay's Lightly Salted Barbecue Flavored Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
406 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
65.6g
Sugars
7.1g
7.8g
Fat
32.1g
3.1g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk Chocolate Marshmallows and Lay's Lightly Salted Barbecue Flavored Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Milk Chocolate Marshmallows is the clear winner. With 165 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk Chocolate Marshmallows contains significantly more sugar (65.6g) compared to the milder Lay's Lightly Salted Barbecue Flavored Potato Chips (7.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lay's Lightly Salted Barbecue Flavored Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Marshmallows or Lay's Lightly Salted Barbecue Flavored Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Milk Chocolate Marshmallows has 406 calories, while Lay's Lightly Salted Barbecue Flavored Potato Chips has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk Chocolate Marshmallows vegan?

No, Milk Chocolate Marshmallows is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk Chocolate Marshmallows and Lay's Lightly Salted Barbecue Flavored Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 165 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.