Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk Chocolate Pistachio And Kadayıf Filling vs Potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk Chocolate Pistachio And Kadayıf Filling

Milk Chocolate Pistachio And Kadayıf Filling

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Potato chips

Potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
920 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
68g
Sugars
0g
60g
Fat
32.1g
16g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk Chocolate Pistachio And Kadayıf Filling and Potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Milk Chocolate Pistachio And Kadayıf Filling is the more energy-dense option here, packing 384 more calories per 100g than Potato chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk Chocolate Pistachio And Kadayıf Filling contains significantly more sugar (68g) compared to the milder Potato chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Milk Chocolate Pistachio And Kadayıf Filling offers a protein boost with 16g per 100g, outperforming Potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Pistachio And Kadayıf Filling or Potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Milk Chocolate Pistachio And Kadayıf Filling has 920 calories, while Potato chips has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk Chocolate Pistachio And Kadayıf Filling vegan?

No, Milk Chocolate Pistachio And Kadayıf Filling is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk Chocolate Pistachio And Kadayıf Filling and Potato chips?

There is a difference of 384 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.