Head-to-Head Analysis

MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE BAKING CHIPS vs Premium Baking Bar, Extra Bittersweet Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE BAKING CHIPS

MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE BAKING CHIPS

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Premium Baking Bar, Extra Bittersweet Chocolate

Premium Baking Bar, Extra Bittersweet Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
429 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
28.6g
28.6g
Fat
50g
7.1g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE BAKING CHIPS and Premium Baking Bar, Extra Bittersweet Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE BAKING CHIPS is the clear winner. With 142 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE BAKING CHIPS takes the lead with only 7.14g of sugar per 100g, whereas Premium Baking Bar, Extra Bittersweet Chocolate contains 28.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE BAKING CHIPS offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Premium Baking Bar, Extra Bittersweet Chocolate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE BAKING CHIPS or Premium Baking Bar, Extra Bittersweet Chocolate?

MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE BAKING CHIPS appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE BAKING CHIPS vegan?

No, MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE BAKING CHIPS is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE BAKING CHIPS and Premium Baking Bar, Extra Bittersweet Chocolate?

There is a difference of 142 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.