Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk Chocolate Style Peanut Butter Cups vs Mini Panettone Classico

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Milk Chocolate Style Peanut Butter Cups

Milk Chocolate Style Peanut Butter Cups

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Mini Panettone Classico

Mini Panettone Classico

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
484 kcal
Energy
376 kcal
3.2g
Sugars
26.5g
38.7g
Fat
15.3g
9.7g
Protein
7.6g
0.8g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk Chocolate Style Peanut Butter Cups and Mini Panettone Classico side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Milk Chocolate Style Peanut Butter Cups is the more energy-dense option here, packing 108 more calories per 100g than Mini Panettone Classico. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Milk Chocolate Style Peanut Butter Cups takes the lead with only 3.23g of sugar per 100g, whereas Mini Panettone Classico contains 26.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Milk Chocolate Style Peanut Butter Cups offers a protein boost with 9.68g per 100g, outperforming Mini Panettone Classico in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Style Peanut Butter Cups or Mini Panettone Classico?

It depends on your goals. Milk Chocolate Style Peanut Butter Cups has 484 calories, while Mini Panettone Classico has 376 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk Chocolate Style Peanut Butter Cups vegan?

No, Milk Chocolate Style Peanut Butter Cups is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk Chocolate Style Peanut Butter Cups and Mini Panettone Classico?

There is a difference of 108 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.