Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk chocolate truffles vs Queen sliced olives with pimiento

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk chocolate truffles

Milk chocolate truffles

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Queen sliced olives with pimiento

Queen sliced olives with pimiento

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
586 kcal
Energy
156.3 kcal
51.7g
Sugars
0g
34.5g
Fat
100g
6.9g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
5.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk chocolate truffles and Queen sliced olives with pimiento side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Milk chocolate truffles is the more energy-dense option here, packing 430 more calories per 100g than Queen sliced olives with pimiento. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk chocolate truffles contains significantly more sugar (51.7g) compared to the milder Queen sliced olives with pimiento (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Queen sliced olives with pimiento is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Milk chocolate truffles offers a protein boost with 6.9g per 100g, outperforming Queen sliced olives with pimiento in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk chocolate truffles or Queen sliced olives with pimiento?

It depends on your goals. Milk chocolate truffles has 586 calories, while Queen sliced olives with pimiento has 156.25 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk chocolate truffles vegan?

No, Milk chocolate truffles is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk chocolate truffles and Queen sliced olives with pimiento?

There is a difference of 430 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.