Head-to-Head Analysis

milk to the max SUPERFOOD LACTATION BAR vs Jack links beef tender strips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of milk to the max SUPERFOOD LACTATION BAR

milk to the max SUPERFOOD LACTATION BAR

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Jack links beef tender strips

Jack links beef tender strips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
440 kcal
Energy
357.1 kcal
28g
Sugars
7.1g
20g
Fat
21.4g
6g
Protein
39.3g
0g
Salt
4.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing milk to the max SUPERFOOD LACTATION BAR and Jack links beef tender strips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

milk to the max SUPERFOOD LACTATION BAR is the more energy-dense option here, packing 83 more calories per 100g than Jack links beef tender strips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. milk to the max SUPERFOOD LACTATION BAR contains significantly more sugar (28g) compared to the milder Jack links beef tender strips (7.1428571428571g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Jack links beef tender strips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: milk to the max SUPERFOOD LACTATION BAR or Jack links beef tender strips?

It depends on your goals. milk to the max SUPERFOOD LACTATION BAR has 440 calories, while Jack links beef tender strips has 357.14285714286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is milk to the max SUPERFOOD LACTATION BAR vegan?

No, milk to the max SUPERFOOD LACTATION BAR is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between milk to the max SUPERFOOD LACTATION BAR and Jack links beef tender strips?

There is a difference of 83 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.