Head-to-Head Analysis

Millet & Flax Garlic Chips vs Unsweetened Simple Organic Coconut Milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Millet & Flax Garlic Chips

Millet & Flax Garlic Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Unsweetened Simple Organic Coconut Milk

Unsweetened Simple Organic Coconut Milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
393 kcal
Energy
175 kcal
0g
Sugars
1.3g
10.7g
Fat
17.5g
3.6g
Protein
1.3g
0.9g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Millet & Flax Garlic Chips and Unsweetened Simple Organic Coconut Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Millet & Flax Garlic Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 218 more calories per 100g than Unsweetened Simple Organic Coconut Milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Millet & Flax Garlic Chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Unsweetened Simple Organic Coconut Milk contains 1.25g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Millet & Flax Garlic Chips offers a protein boost with 3.57g per 100g, outperforming Unsweetened Simple Organic Coconut Milk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Millet & Flax Garlic Chips or Unsweetened Simple Organic Coconut Milk?

It depends on your goals. Millet & Flax Garlic Chips has 393 calories, while Unsweetened Simple Organic Coconut Milk has 175 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Millet & Flax Garlic Chips vegan?

No, Millet & Flax Garlic Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Millet & Flax Garlic Chips and Unsweetened Simple Organic Coconut Milk?

There is a difference of 218 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.