Head-to-Head Analysis

Milo Chocolate Malt vs Cocoa powder

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milo Chocolate Malt

Milo Chocolate Malt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cocoa powder

Cocoa powder

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
391.3 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
47.8g
Sugars
0g
6.5g
Fat
28.6g
8.7g
Protein
21.4g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milo Chocolate Malt and Cocoa powder side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Milo Chocolate Malt is the clear winner. With 109 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milo Chocolate Malt contains significantly more sugar (47.8261g) compared to the milder Cocoa powder (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cocoa powder is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milo Chocolate Malt or Cocoa powder?

It depends on your goals. Milo Chocolate Malt has 391.3043 calories, while Cocoa powder has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milo Chocolate Malt vegan?

No, Milo Chocolate Malt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milo Chocolate Malt and Cocoa powder?

There is a difference of 109 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.