Head-to-Head Analysis

Milo Chocolate Malt vs Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee)

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milo Chocolate Malt

Milo Chocolate Malt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee)

Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee)

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
391.3 kcal
Energy
534.9 kcal
47.8g
Sugars
27.9g
6.5g
Fat
39.5g
8.7g
Protein
7g
0.7g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milo Chocolate Malt and Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee) side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Milo Chocolate Malt is the clear winner. With 144 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milo Chocolate Malt contains significantly more sugar (47.8261g) compared to the milder Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee) (27.906976744186g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee) is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milo Chocolate Malt or Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee)?

It depends on your goals. Milo Chocolate Malt has 391.3043 calories, while Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee) has 534.88372093023 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milo Chocolate Malt vegan?

No, Milo Chocolate Malt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milo Chocolate Malt and Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee)?

There is a difference of 144 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.