Head-to-Head Analysis

Mini Beignets Filled With Chocolate Hazelnut vs M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Mini Beignets Filled With Chocolate Hazelnut

Mini Beignets Filled With Chocolate Hazelnut

Not Vegan
VS
Package of M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size

M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
440 kcal
Energy
467 kcal
24g
Sugars
63.3g
28g
Fat
20g
8g
Protein
3.3g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mini Beignets Filled With Chocolate Hazelnut and M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mini Beignets Filled With Chocolate Hazelnut is the clear winner. With 27 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Mini Beignets Filled With Chocolate Hazelnut takes the lead with only 24g of sugar per 100g, whereas M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size contains 63.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Mini Beignets Filled With Chocolate Hazelnut offers a protein boost with 8g per 100g, outperforming M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mini Beignets Filled With Chocolate Hazelnut or M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size?

Mini Beignets Filled With Chocolate Hazelnut appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Mini Beignets Filled With Chocolate Hazelnut vegan?

No, Mini Beignets Filled With Chocolate Hazelnut is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mini Beignets Filled With Chocolate Hazelnut and M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size?

There is a difference of 27 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.