Head-to-Head Analysis

Mini Clif Bar Chocolate Brownie vs Sea Salt Pepper & Onion Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mini Clif Bar Chocolate Brownie

Mini Clif Bar Chocolate Brownie

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt Pepper & Onion Chips

Sea Salt Pepper & Onion Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357 kcal
Energy
564 kcal
25g
Sugars
0g
8.9g
Fat
31.8g
14.3g
Protein
7.2g
2.4g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mini Clif Bar Chocolate Brownie and Sea Salt Pepper & Onion Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mini Clif Bar Chocolate Brownie is the clear winner. With 207 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mini Clif Bar Chocolate Brownie contains significantly more sugar (25g) compared to the milder Sea Salt Pepper & Onion Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salt Pepper & Onion Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Mini Clif Bar Chocolate Brownie offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Sea Salt Pepper & Onion Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mini Clif Bar Chocolate Brownie or Sea Salt Pepper & Onion Chips?

It depends on your goals. Mini Clif Bar Chocolate Brownie has 357 calories, while Sea Salt Pepper & Onion Chips has 564 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mini Clif Bar Chocolate Brownie vegan?

No, Mini Clif Bar Chocolate Brownie is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mini Clif Bar Chocolate Brownie and Sea Salt Pepper & Onion Chips?

There is a difference of 207 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.