Head-to-Head Analysis

Mini oreos vs dark chocolate covered almonds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mini oreos

Mini oreos

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of dark chocolate covered almonds

dark chocolate covered almonds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
483 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
41.4g
Sugars
0g
20.7g
Fat
0g
3.5g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mini oreos and dark chocolate covered almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Mini oreos is the more energy-dense option here, packing 483 more calories per 100g than dark chocolate covered almonds. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mini oreos contains significantly more sugar (41.4g) compared to the milder dark chocolate covered almonds (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, dark chocolate covered almonds is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Mini oreos offers a protein boost with 3.45g per 100g, outperforming dark chocolate covered almonds in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mini oreos or dark chocolate covered almonds?

It depends on your goals. Mini oreos has 483 calories, while dark chocolate covered almonds has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mini oreos vegan?

No, Mini oreos is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mini oreos and dark chocolate covered almonds?

There is a difference of 483 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.