Head-to-Head Analysis

Mini pasta shells & meatballs vs Great Value Paprika, 2.5 oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mini pasta shells & meatballs

Mini pasta shells & meatballs

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Great Value Paprika, 2.5 oz

Great Value Paprika, 2.5 oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
102.4 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
3.5g
Sugars
0g
4.3g
Fat
0g
3.5g
Protein
0g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mini pasta shells & meatballs and Great Value Paprika, 2.5 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Mini pasta shells & meatballs is the more energy-dense option here, packing 102 more calories per 100g than Great Value Paprika, 2.5 oz. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mini pasta shells & meatballs contains significantly more sugar (3.54g) compared to the milder Great Value Paprika, 2.5 oz (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Great Value Paprika, 2.5 oz is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Mini pasta shells & meatballs offers a protein boost with 3.54g per 100g, outperforming Great Value Paprika, 2.5 oz in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mini pasta shells & meatballs or Great Value Paprika, 2.5 oz?

It depends on your goals. Mini pasta shells & meatballs has 102.36 calories, while Great Value Paprika, 2.5 oz has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mini pasta shells & meatballs vegan?

No, Mini pasta shells & meatballs is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mini pasta shells & meatballs and Great Value Paprika, 2.5 oz?

There is a difference of 102 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.