Head-to-Head Analysis

Mini Sundae Cones vs Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mini Sundae Cones

Mini Sundae Cones

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry

Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
341 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
22.7g
Sugars
0g
19.3g
Fat
0g
5.7g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mini Sundae Cones and Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Mini Sundae Cones is the more energy-dense option here, packing 341 more calories per 100g than Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mini Sundae Cones contains significantly more sugar (22.7g) compared to the milder Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Mini Sundae Cones offers a protein boost with 5.68g per 100g, outperforming Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mini Sundae Cones or Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry?

It depends on your goals. Mini Sundae Cones has 341 calories, while Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mini Sundae Cones vegan?

No, Mini Sundae Cones is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mini Sundae Cones and Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry?

There is a difference of 341 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.