Head-to-Head Analysis

Mini Vegetable Samosas vs Brand authentic texas recipe mild no beans chili

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mini Vegetable Samosas

Mini Vegetable Samosas

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Brand authentic texas recipe mild no beans chili

Brand authentic texas recipe mild no beans chili

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
189 kcal
Energy
155.3 kcal
4.2g
Sugars
0.9g
7.4g
Fat
11.3g
4.2g
Protein
6.4g
1g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mini Vegetable Samosas and Brand authentic texas recipe mild no beans chili side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Mini Vegetable Samosas is the more energy-dense option here, packing 34 more calories per 100g than Brand authentic texas recipe mild no beans chili. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mini Vegetable Samosas contains significantly more sugar (4.21g) compared to the milder Brand authentic texas recipe mild no beans chili (0.94117647058824g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Brand authentic texas recipe mild no beans chili is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mini Vegetable Samosas or Brand authentic texas recipe mild no beans chili?

It depends on your goals. Mini Vegetable Samosas has 189 calories, while Brand authentic texas recipe mild no beans chili has 155.29411764706 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mini Vegetable Samosas vegan?

No, Mini Vegetable Samosas is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mini Vegetable Samosas and Brand authentic texas recipe mild no beans chili?

There is a difference of 34 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.