Head-to-Head Analysis

MINIATURE CHEESECAKE ASSORTMENT vs organic coconut crispy rollers original coconut

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of MINIATURE CHEESECAKE ASSORTMENT

MINIATURE CHEESECAKE ASSORTMENT

Not Vegan
VS
Package of organic coconut crispy rollers original coconut

organic coconut crispy rollers original coconut

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
21.4g
Sugars
26.7g
23.8g
Fat
23.3g
6.4g
Protein
1.4g
0.7g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing MINIATURE CHEESECAKE ASSORTMENT and organic coconut crispy rollers original coconut side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, MINIATURE CHEESECAKE ASSORTMENT is the clear winner. With 143 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, MINIATURE CHEESECAKE ASSORTMENT takes the lead with only 21.4g of sugar per 100g, whereas organic coconut crispy rollers original coconut contains 26.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? MINIATURE CHEESECAKE ASSORTMENT offers a protein boost with 6.35g per 100g, outperforming organic coconut crispy rollers original coconut in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: MINIATURE CHEESECAKE ASSORTMENT or organic coconut crispy rollers original coconut?

MINIATURE CHEESECAKE ASSORTMENT appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is MINIATURE CHEESECAKE ASSORTMENT vegan?

No, MINIATURE CHEESECAKE ASSORTMENT is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between MINIATURE CHEESECAKE ASSORTMENT and organic coconut crispy rollers original coconut?

There is a difference of 143 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.