Head-to-Head Analysis

minis snack-size energy bar vs Snacking Chocolate Dark Chocolate Almond With Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of minis snack-size energy bar

minis snack-size energy bar

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Snacking Chocolate Dark Chocolate Almond With Sea Salt

Snacking Chocolate Dark Chocolate Almond With Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
393 kcal
Energy
516 kcal
25g
Sugars
35.5g
10.7g
Fat
38.7g
14.3g
Protein
9.7g
0.8g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing minis snack-size energy bar and Snacking Chocolate Dark Chocolate Almond With Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, minis snack-size energy bar is the clear winner. With 123 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, minis snack-size energy bar takes the lead with only 25g of sugar per 100g, whereas Snacking Chocolate Dark Chocolate Almond With Sea Salt contains 35.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? minis snack-size energy bar offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Snacking Chocolate Dark Chocolate Almond With Sea Salt in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: minis snack-size energy bar or Snacking Chocolate Dark Chocolate Almond With Sea Salt?

minis snack-size energy bar appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is minis snack-size energy bar vegan?

No, minis snack-size energy bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between minis snack-size energy bar and Snacking Chocolate Dark Chocolate Almond With Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 123 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.